Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 MINN 184 - Smith v. Lytle

Smith v. Lytle’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 1936
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1936

9 state decisions

30188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horton v. Maffitt · Jeffries v. Sherburn · Harris v. . Murray · Forrer v. Kloke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The equitable doctrine of merger has no application where it is clearly for the interest of the party holding the two estates that they be kept separate and distinct, unless a contrary intention is expressly shown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.