Kaser v. Haas’s Empirical Analysis
1881
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2002
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilder v. Haughey · Ward v. George Huhn & Co. · Spencer v. Geissman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * the character of the ownership, or of the estate or interest owned, is not material, so that it gives the right of occupancy — so that there is a concurrence of ownership and occupancy, the former sustaining the latter.” (Italics supplied.) Kaser v. Haas, 27 Minn. 406, 408 , 7 N. W. 824, 825 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.