Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 Misc. 810

Smith v. Drought

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1899

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1899-03-15

<p>Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1939

1 state decisions

Relies on Murdock v. . Gilchrist · Remington v. . Palmer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1899-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hascall, J.

¶1We find that no error, calling for reversal, was committed upon the trial. The question of interest on the plaintiff’s claim, after elimination therefrom of the item of $25 for sideboard, was agreed upon- as amounting to $40, so that the verdict seemed to be at the correct figure.

¶2To all the material points raised by the appellant, upon his argument and brief, we think that the cases of Remington v. Palmer, 62 N. Y. 31, and Murdock v. Gilchrist, 52 N. Y. 242, are a complete answer.

¶3.Judgment and order appealed‘ from affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

¶4Fitzsimons, Oh. J., concurs.

¶5Judgment 'and order affirmed, with costs.

/27/misc/810 · .json · Public domain