Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 Misc. 840

Bayerdorfer v. Bowles

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1899-05-15

<p>Appeal from an order of the Special Term.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1899

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1899-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In making the order appealed from the Special Term justice follows the settled practice of this court. Where a summons is served with a notice but no verified complaint served,., the practice here is to apply to the Special Term for leave to enter, judgment. We think that it was not necessary .in this, instance to appoint a referee to determine the amount of damage. ,

¶2The clerk may do so, nor do- we think that costs should have been allowed. Therefore, the order must be modified by striking therefrom the costs allowed, also the provision for appointing a referee, and as -so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs Or disbursements to either party. Of course the plaintiff’s attorney will credit on the issuance of the execution the amount received herein (by the client.

¶3Present: Fitzsím'ons, Oh. J.',. and McCarthy, J.

¶4Order modified, and' as modified affirmed, without costs.

/27/misc/840 · .json · Public domain