Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 MISS 412 - Friley v. Hendricks

Friley v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

1854

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1902
most recently cited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A decree cannot be set aside upon the ground of fraud, or for any other cause, without having all the parties to a decree before the court So, in a bill of review, it Is indispensable that all the parties to the original decree should be included; and, if they be dead, their legal representatives must be made parties.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.