Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 MO 332 - State v. Cross

State v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis

1858

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), Goodwin v. State (1883)

25 state decisions

9018581860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merritt v. Arden · State v. Buckner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To look for deliberation and forethought in a man maddened by intoxication is vain, for drunkenness has deprived him of the deliberating faculties to a greater or less extent; and if this deprivation is to relieve him of all responsibility or to diminish it, the great majority of crimes committed will go unpunished. This however is not the doctrine of the common law; and to its maxims, based as they obviously are upon true wisdom and sound policy, we must adhere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A mistake or accident may happen to a man, whether drunk or sober, and if they are more likely to occur when in the former predicament, he is not entitled to any advantage over the sober man by reason of this.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.