Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 N.C. App. 162

Gardner v. Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1975

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1975-10-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1975

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HEDRICK, Judge.

¶1Plaintiffs’ exception to the critical findings of fact raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence or the stipulations in the record to support such findings.

¶2The record before us demonstrates that the court heard no evidence and that the parties made no stipulations as to the facts. Thus, the record does not support the critical findings of fact from which the trial court drew its conclusions of law and entered judgment for the defendants. Because the record fails to support the judgment, the judgment must be vacated and the cause remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

¶3Vacated and remanded.

Judges Britt and Martin concur.
/27/ncapp/162 · .json · Public domain