Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 NCAPP 211 - State v. Little

State v. Little’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2008

8 state decisions

401975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. McClain · State v. McClain · State v. . Harris · State v. Jones · State v. . Beam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the requisite degree of relevancy exists is a judicial question to be resolved in the light of the consideration that the inevitable tendency of such evidence is to raise a legally spurious presumption of guilt in the minds of thejurors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.