Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 Nev. 432

76 P 1134

Esden v. Kaiser

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1904

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 1904-07-05

A. Murphy, Judge. Action by Lillie Esden against Emma Kaiser. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the statement of facts in the case of Painter v. Kaiser (page 421 of this volume), involving precisely the same issues and questions.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1959

2 state decisions

Relies on Painter v. Kaiser

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed, · Decided 1904-07-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court, Tabbot, J.:

¶1 This case depends upon the same contract and involves the same legal principles as those controlling the decision in the suit of Fannie Painter v. Emma Kaiser, 27 Nev. 421, *435 just determined by this court, except that tbe plaintiff here signed tbe contract.

¶2 For tbe reasons regarding tbe first point stated in that opinion, tbe order and judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action are reversed, and the case is remanded, with direction to the district court to fix a time within which the defendant will be allowed to answer.

Belknap, O. J., and Fitzgerald, J., concur.
/27/nev/432 · .json · Public domain