State v. Lanza’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford (1975), Ahto v. Weaver (1963)
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Reese · City of Trenton v. New Jersey · Dorchy v. State of Kansas · United States v. Steffens · United States v. Carmack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'must be determined on the basis of whether the objectionable feature of the statute can be excised without substantial impairment of the principal object of the statute.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should stand or fall as a unitary whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Eminent domain is the power of the State to take private property for public use ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.