Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 NM 477 - State v. Diamond

State v. Diamond’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
14
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Winters v. People of State of New York (1948), State v. Laguna (1999)

77 state decisions — followed in 14 states

1801921193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schenck v. United States · United States v. Reese · State v. Garcia · Gilbert v. State of Minnesota · Ex parte Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [T]he question of the constitutionality of the act involved determines whether a crime has been committed. If the law is void, no crime has been committed and none can be committed under it ... . State v. Diamond, 27 N.M. 477, 488 , 202 P. 988, 993 , 20 A.L.R. 1527 , 1535 (1921).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where the statute uses words of no determinative meaning, or the language is so general and indefinite as to embrace not only acts commonly recognized as reprehensible, but also others which it is unreasonable to presume were intended to be made criminal, it will be declared void for uncertainty. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.