Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 NM 605 - Neel v. Barker

Neel v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1989

5 state decisions

401922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leavenworth Lawrence and Galveston Railroad Company v. United States · Davis v. Wiebbold · Frasher v. O'Connor · Mower v. Fletcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress did not intend to grant to the state any mineral lands . . . it follows that the state is not controlled nor restricted by said act in regard to leasing said lands for mineral purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.