Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ohio App. 2d 45 - Mullins v. Rinks, Inc.

27 Ohio App. 2d 45 - Mullins v. Rinks, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2015

21 state decisions

14019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 12 Ohio App. 2d 110 - Bronaugh v. Harding Hospital, Inc. · 111 Ohio App. 537 - Isaiah v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · 94 Ohio App. 313 - Lester v. Albers Super Markets, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) A merchant, or his employee or agent, who has probable cause to believe that items offered for sale by a mercantile establishment have been unlawfully taken by a person, may, for the purposes set forth in division (C) of this section, detain the person in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time within the mercantile establishment or its immediate vicinity. “(C) [A] merchant or his employee or agent * * * may detain another person for any of the following purposes: “(1) To recover the property that is the subject of the unlawful taking, criminal mischief, or theft: “(2) To cause an arrest to be made by a peace officer; “(3) To obtain a warrant of arrest. “(D) [T]he merchant * * * shall not search the person, search or seize any property belonging to the person detained without the person’s consent or use undue restraint upon the person detained.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.