Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ohio App. 3d 160 - True v. Currens

27 Ohio App. 3d 160 - True v. Currens’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parham v. J. L. · Suver v. Personal Service Insurance · 18 Ohio St. 2d 94 - City of Toledo v. Bernoir · Hunter v. City of Cleveland · Thornton v. Personal Service Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““NOW, THEREFORE, the conditions of this obligation are as follows: “(b) If on account of his and only his personal operation of a motor vehicle on the public streets, roads or highways in Ohio, while this bond remains in force, a judgment is rendered against him, then this bond shall remain in force up to the following specified limits and amounts: (t * * * “(3) The aggregate amount of $7,500 because of damage to property of others in any one accident.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.