Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ohio App. 3d 298 - Vanasdal v. Brinker

27 Ohio App. 3d 298 - Vanasdal v. Brinker’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 74 Ohio App. 3d 829 - Thompson v. Hayslip (1991), Bullion v. Gahm (2005)

45 state decisions

24019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · 125 Ohio St. 241 - Kimball v. Anderson · Reed v. Evans · 68 Ohio App. 2d 219 - Montieth v. Twin Falls United Methodist Church, Inc. · 90 Ohio App. 38 - Smith v. Krites

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he owner is charged with knowledge of adverse use when one enters into open and notorious possession of the land under a claim of right.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that everyone believed the strip in dispute actually belonged to Vanasdal so that no one challenged his use of the land earlier is also immaterial. The doctrine of adverse possession protects one who has honestly entered and held possession in the belief that the land was his own, as well as one who knowingly appropriates the land of others for the purpose of acquiring title. Yetzer v. Thoman (1866), 17 Ohio St. 130 ; Montieth v. Twin Falls United Methodist Church (1980), 68 Ohio App.2d 219 , 222 , 428 N.E.2d 870 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.