27 Ohio App. 3d 70 - Miller v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2005
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. VIP Development Co. · John v. Lococo · 8 Ohio App. 3d 38 - Finley v. Schuett · Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Harden's Adm'x · 104 Ohio App. 469 - King v. Magaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tjhere is no presumption that the wrongful act of the agent was the act of the principal; authority to do the act must be demonstrated, or ratification of the act by the principal shown. Where the tort consists of a wilful and malicious act, as here, it is not generally considered to be within the scope of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.