Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 OHIOST2D 162 - State v. Dick

State v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion) (2016), Steele v. Taylor (1982)

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

220197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bridges v. Wixon · Palmer v. Peyton · United States v. Romero · State v. Carter · 134 Ohio St. 16 - State v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`when taken by surprise by the adverse testimony of its own witness, . . . the state may interrogate such witness concerning his prior inconsistent . . . statement . . . for the purpose of refreshing the recollection of the witness, but not for the purpose of offering substantive evidence against the accused.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[A] previous statement of the witness, though admissible to impeach, is not evidence of the facts stated. * * * When used for that purpose, the statement is hearsay. Its value rests on the credit of the declarant, who was not under oath nor subject to cross-examination, when the statement was made.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]n extra-judicial, unsworn, signed statement of a witness which has been denied by the declarant under oath is not admissible as proof of the allegations contained therein.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.