Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Okla. 124 - Burnett v. Davis

Burnett v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1930
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1930

9 state decisions

60191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnes v. Lynch · Jones v. Charles P. Kellogg & Co. · Roser v. Fourth National Bank · Hale v. Haselton · St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Corser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And in all causes heretofore or hereafter tried, when the term of office of the trial judge shall have expired or may hereafter expire 'before the time fixed for making or settling and signing a case, it shall be his duty to certify, sign or settle the case in all respects as if his term had not expired. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.