Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Okla. 172 - Walker v. Bowman

Walker v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2007

12 state decisions

301910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amy v. Dubuque · Lattin v. Gillette · Brown v. Sims · Schade v. Gehner · Ham v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Also, in such a case where the petition alleges the breach of duty and also special and consequential damages, the breach of the duty, and not the • consequential damage, is the cause of action.” (Citing authority.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A cause of action accrues from the time the right to sue for the breach attaches/ (Citing cases.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “means to become a present and enforceable demand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.