¶1 The defendant in error has moved that this proceeding in error be dismissed for the reason that since the same was instituted the controversy between the parties hereto has been settled and the question here presented for review is now hypothetical. Counsel for plaintiff in error concedes such to be the facts. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
27 Okla. 781
117 P 199
Davis v. Humbarger
Decided January 10, 1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1911-01-10
<p>Action between Charles E. Davis and Stewart Humbarger, executor for the estate of Otto Botcher, deceased. From the judgment, Davis brings error.</p>
Dismissed · Decided 1911-01-10