Shmit v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2003
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weber v. Rothchild · Ferguson v. Wisconsin Central Railroad · Peabody v. O. R. & N. Co. · Woods v. Courtney · Torrence v. Strong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the general rule, and one of very comprehensive scope, is that where there is no ruling [below], or no sufficient request to rule, there is no available error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appellate courts will consider those law questions only which by the record appear to have been properly presented to and decided by the trial court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.