State v. Glas’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · 111 Wash. 2d 22 - City of Seattle v. Eze · 111 Wash. 2d 923 - City of Seattle v. Huff · 120 Wash. 2d 334 - State v. McDougal · State v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“People preserve their bodily privacy by wearing clothes in public and undressing in private. It makes no sense to protect the privacy of undressing unless privacy while clothed is presumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Glas“[a] place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that his or her undressing was being photographed or filmed by another;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Glas“[t]hat commonsense reference [sic] followed from the evidence here, including Mr. Glas's statement that the photographs were ultimately destined for a pornographic Internet web site.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Diaz-Flores
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.