Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 P3D 600 - Hadley v. Maxwell

Hadley v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
5
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Christensen v. Grant County Hosp. Dist. (2004), Clark v. Baines (2004)

48 state decisions

270200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · 126 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Olson · Reid v. Pierce County · 121 Wash. 2d 552 - Hanson v. City of Snohomish · 113 Wash. 2d 413 - Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy Committee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) identical issues; (2) a final judgment on the merits; (3) the party against whom the plea is asserted must have been a party to or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication; and (4) application of the doctrine must not work an injustice on the party against whom the doctrine is to be applied.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Collateral estoppel promotes judicial economy and prevents inconvenience, and even harassment, of parties.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Collateral estoppel is, in the end, an equitable doctrine that will not be applied mechanically to work an injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.