Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 SC 193 - Lessly v. Bowie

Lessly v. Bowie’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2007

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

201887189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law requires that all contracts concerning the transfer of land shall be in writing. A purchaser must protect himself by covenants. It follows that, where there is no express warranty, none can be implied. Omission to warrant disproves intention to warrant, and, if that could be contradicted by implication, it would be not only creating a contract against the intention, but proving it by parol. As to land, there can be no such thing as failure of consideration growing out of a breach of contract, or, as it is sometimes expressed, the equitable condition of sale; otherwise, there would he, so far as that defense is concerned, no difference between a quitclaim and a warranty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.