Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 So. 3d 175

Scholtes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-02-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Gissendanner v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-02-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
/27/so3d/175 · .json · Public domain