Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 S.W.2d 122

Shaw v. Rose

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1930

Texas Commission of Appeals · decided 1930-04-23

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-04-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2000

3 state decisions

1019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARVEY, P. J.

¶1This case presents the same question as that involved in Shaw, Banking Commissioner, v. McBride, 27 S.W.(2d) 121, this day decided. The decision in the latter ease controls the disposition of this case. We therefore recommend that the judgment of the trial court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals [11 S.W.(2d) 547] be affirmed.

CURETON, C. J.

¶2The judgments of the district court and Court of Civil Appeals are both affirmed, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

/27/sw2d/122 · .json · Public domain