Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 TC 783 - Katz v. Commissioner

Katz v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 1976
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1976

1 federal appellate ·

30195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Disston · Fondren v. Commissioner · United States v. Baker · Stifel v. Commissioner · Stifel v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the trust is to qualify as a present interest, the beneficiary 'must have the right presently to use, possess or enjoy the property.' Fondren v. Commissioner , 324 U.S. 18 , 20 ; Commissioner v. Disston , 325 U.S. 442 . Or, at the very least, the beneficiary or someone standing in his shoes (such as a guardian or a parent) must have the unqualified right to demand at anytime that the property be turned over to the beneficiary or applied for his benefit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “not in fact a guardian he cannot be transformed into one merely by labeling his authority as being equivalent to that of a guardian.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “although he [donor] invested the trustees with broad authority, they were nevertheless trustees and not guardians.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.