Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 Tex. 333

State v. Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1863-07-01

A ppeal from Limestone. Tried below before the Hon. James C. Walker. The appellee was indicted at the Fall Term, 1860, of the District Court of Limestone county, for the offence of marking, with his own mark, “one calf, said calf being neat cattle within the meaning of the statute, not the property of him, the said Wm. N. Hall, but of the property of John R. Henry, of said county,” &c., “ contrary to the form cf the statute,” &c. The defendant excepted to the indictment— “1.

Decided 1863-07-01

Moore, J.

¶1This is an indictment for unlawfully marking and branding cattle, and is founded upon art. 767 of the Penal Code. To constitute the offence attempted to be charged by the indictment, the act must be done “ without the consent of the owner,” and “ with intent to defraud.” For aught that appears from this indictment, the defendant may have been authorized by the owner of the calf to brand it. That he was not, is a material allegation in charging the offence, and should, therefore, have been stated.

¶2The intention to defraud is the gist of the offence, and should also have been charged. (See Code Crim., Proc. art. 399.) The judgment is affirmed.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/27/tex/333 · .json · Public domain