Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 U.S. 201 - David Hunt v. Robert Wickliffe

David Hunt v. Robert Wickliffe’s Empirical Analysis

27 U.S. 201 · 1829

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 1936
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1936

5 state decisions

30182918301840185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Green v. John Liter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where two persons are in possession of distinct portions of the land in controversy, it is well settled that he who has the better right is in constructive possession of all not actually occupied by his adversary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.