Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 UTAH2D 222 - Brimhall v. Mecham

Brimhall v. Mecham’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2020

13 state decisions

60197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fitzgerald v. Fernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the concept of a void judgment is narrowly construed in the interest of finality.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “judgment is void under rule 60(b)(4) if the court that rendered it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter or parties, or the judgment was entered without the notice required by due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.