Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Va. App. 477 - Jefferson v. Commonwealth

27 Va. App. 477 - Jefferson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2017

24 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Goins v. Commonwealth · Robinson v. Commonwealth · Parris v. Commonwealth · Hooper v. Da Garraghty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a "strict legal term" "synonymous with a failure to exercise a sound, reasonable and legal discretion," a "clearly erroneous conclusion and judgment one . . . clearly against logic[,] [and] the reasonable and probable deductions to be drawn from the facts disclosed." Black's Law Dictionary 10 (6th ed.1990 (citations omitted)). "`[T]he discretion of the able, learned and experienced trial judge . . . will not be interfered with upon review of this Court, unless some injustice has been done.'" Bell v. Kirby, 226 Va. 641, 643 , 311 S.E.2d 799, 800 (1984) (quoting Temple v. Moses, 175 Va. 320, 337 , 8 S.E.2d 262, 269 (1940)). Thus, we should reverse only upon "clear evidence that [the decision] was not judicially sound" and not simply to substitute our "discretion for that rendered below." Nat'l Linen Serv. v. Parker, 21 Va.App. 8, 19 , 461 S.E.2d 404, 410 (1995).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““it may be said that the withdrawal of a [pre-sentencing] plea of guilty should not be denied in any case where it is in the least evident that the ends of justice will be subserved by permitting not guilty to be pleaded in its place. The least surprise or influence causing a defendant to plead guilty when he has any defense at all should be sufficient grounds for permitting a change of plea from guilty to not guilty. Leave should ordinarily be given to withdraw a plea of guilty if it was entered by mistake or under a misconcep tion of the nature of the charge; through a misunderstanding as to its effect; through fear, fraud, or official misrepresentation; was made involuntarily for any reason; or even where it was entered inadvisedly, if any reasonable grounds is offered for going to the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] motion to withdraw a plea of guilty ... may be made only before sentence is imposed or imposition of a sentence is suspended; but to correct manifest injustice, the court within twenty-one days after entry of a final order may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.