¶1This is an application to stay the exe cution of the death sentence of William Aldon Seaton under the judgment of the superior court of King county. The application for the stay of execution is founded upon a notice of appeal filed in the superior court, from the order of the judge of that court fixing the day of execution, and directed to the sheriff of the county. Tbh prosecuting attorney of King county opposes the application, and moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order made is not appealable. The motion must be sustained upon the authority of State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403 (58 Pac. 248, 53 L. R. A. 584), and State v. Boyce, 25 Wash. 422 (65 Pac. 763). The application is denied.
27 Wash. 120
State v. Seaton
Decided January 2, 1902
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1902-01-02
<p> Original Application for Stay of Execution. </p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1989
1 state decisions
Relies on State v. Nordstrom · State v. Boyce
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1902-01-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →