Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 WYO 301 - Chatterton v. Bonelli

Chatterton v. Bonelli’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1936
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wight v. Nicholson · Mitchell v. Overman · Warren v. Palmer · Perkins v. Hayward · Hickman v. City of Ft Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This sufficiently shows the overruling of the motion and the exception to that ruling. But the motion is not embraced in the bill and it is not a part of the record unless incorporated in the bill. Seibel v. Bath, supra ( 5 Wyo. 409 , 40 Pac. 756 ). That the reference to it as above is insufficient as a compliance with the rule and the decisions that the motion shall be embraced in the bill, is well settled and was explicitly so held in Seng v. State, supra ( 20 Wyo. 222 , 122 Pac. 631 ).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If within said sixty days the party excepting shall make it satisfactorily to appear to the court or judge authorized to allow the bill of exceptions that the party will be unavoidably prevented from presenting the bill within said time, the court or judge by written order may extend said time, but not to exceed sixty additional days.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.