Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 ALA 596 - Jackson v. Jackson

Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1972
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Savage v. Savage · North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Coleman · Mathison v. Mathison · Markham v. Markham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We agree with the trial court that the cross bill seeking independent c ■ uitable relief against the original complainant, i. e., a divorce on statutory grounds connected with or growing out of the original bill may be based on facts which may have occurred after the original bill was filed, but before the cross bill was filed. Therefore, the demurrer to the cross bill attacking it for that reason was properly overruled, and the- decree should be affirmed.” ( 267 Ala. at page 103 , 100 So.2d at page 13 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.