Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 F. 273

Docket Nos. 12, 13.

The Hokendauqua

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1920.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1920-11-10

<p>Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p> <p>Suits in admiralty for collision by Anthony O’Boyle and by John Hildebrandt against the tug Hokendauqua, with the tug Henry Steers, impleaded. Decree against the Hokendauqua (270 Fed. 270), and it appeals.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1994

3 counsel of record

Relies on The Hokendauqua

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1920-11-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Suits in admiralty for collision by Anthony O’Boyle and by John Hildebrandt against the tug Hokendauqua, with the tug Henry Steers, impleaded. Decree against the Hokendauqua (270 Fed. 270), and it appeals.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Herbert Green, of New York City, for appellant claimant of the Hoken dauqua.

¶5Park & Mattison, of New York City (S. Park, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee claimant of the Henry Steers.

¶6Macklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Wyek, of New York City, for other appellees.

¶7Before WARD and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

¶8PER CURIAM.

¶9Decree affirmed.

/270/f1d/273 · .json · Public domain