Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.1d 695 - In re Coffield

In re Coffield’s Empirical Analysis

270 F. 695 · 1921

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 1947
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1947

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

60192119301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loom Company v. Higgins · Re Harbeck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The idea here developed is in the twilight zone between invention and mere mechanical improvement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We will apply the rule of the courts generally and resolve the doubt in favor of the inventor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.