Young Ah Chor v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis
270 F.2d 338 · 1959
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Lyda v. United States (1963), Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (1999)
25 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quock Ting v. United States · United States v. Manton · Nishikawa v. Dulles · Howell Chevrolet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · John Stein v. William Bowman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ <* * * js that cross-examination be permitted for the purpose of testing the capacity of the witness to remember, to observe, to recount, and for the purpose of testing the sincerity and truthfulness of the witness. This may be done with respect to subjects not strictly relevant to the testimony given by the witness on direct examination. The extent of the cross-examination is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. United States v. Bender, 7 Cir., 218 F.2d 869 ; United States v. Manton, 2d Cir., 107 F.2d 834 . “The extent to which cross-examination upon collateral matters shall go is a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the trial judge. And his action will not be interfered with unless there has been upon his part a plain abuse of discretion.” United States v. Manton, supra, at page 845. * * * ’ ” Young Ah Chor v. Dulles, 270 F.2d 338 at 342 (9th Cir. 1959).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is not every statement or tradition in the family that can be admitted in evidence. The tradition must be from persons having such a connection with the party to whom it relates, that it is natural and likely, from their domestic habits and connections, that they are speaking the truth, and that they could not be mistaken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.