Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.2d 616 - Clyde E. Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Company, Inc. And Stanley Williams, Clyde E. Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Company, Inc. And Stanley Williams

Clyde E. Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Company, Inc. And Stanley Williams, Clyde E. Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Company, Inc. And Stanley Williams’s Empirical Analysis

270 F.2d 616 · 1959

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn (1964), Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. (1962)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

2701959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If an amount representing damages is received or accrued during a taxable year as a result of an award in, or settlement of, a civil action brought under section 4 of the Act * * *, for injuries sustained by the taxpayer in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws, then the tax attributable to the inclusion of such amount in gross income for the taxable year shall not be greater than the aggregate of the increases in taxes which would have resulted if such amount had been included in gross income in equal installments for each month during the period in which such injuries were sustained by the taxpayer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.