270 F.2d 809 - Blaylock v. United States — 270 F.2d 809

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2005

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Burton & Hennessy, Michael T. Hennessy, Yreka, Cal., Huber & Goodwin, Norman Cissna, Eureka, Cal., for appellants.

¶2Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ciaron C. Spencer, Roger P. Marquis, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Lynn J. Gillard, U. S. Atty., Bernard Petrie, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before STEPHENS, POPE and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal from the United States District Court concerns the title to a claimed Homestead in Siskiyou County, California, upon certain lands in the Kla-math National Forest and the United States prays for an injunction against logging the timber thereon.

¶6The description of the lands in suit together with the Memorandum Opinion of the trial judge and his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Judgment are fully set out in the record. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as found by the trial judge are amply supported by the applicable law and facts. We are in full accord with the reasoning of trial court in his Memorandum Opinion, and adopt it as our basis for affirming the judgment appealed from. D.C.Cal., 159 F.Supp. 874.

¶7Affirmed.