Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.2d 848 - Robert Tickle v. L. R. Summers, Sheriff of Pulaski County, Virginia

Robert Tickle v. L. R. Summers, Sheriff of Pulaski County, Virginia’s Empirical Analysis

270 F.2d 848 · 1959

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
February 1997
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1997

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

9019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Darr v. Burford · Frisbie v. Collins · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return · Henry Urquhart v. Thomas Brown · Young v. Ragen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is an exceedingly delicate jurisdiction given to the Federal courts by which a person under an indictment in a state court, and subject to its laws, may, by the decision of a single judge of the Federal court, upon a writ of habeas corpus, be taken out of the custody of the officers of the state, and finally discharged therefrom.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Ordinarily an application for habeas corpus by one detained under a state court judgment of conviction for crime will be entertained by a federal court only after all state remedies available, including all-appellate remedies in the state courts and in this Court by appeal or by writ of certiora-ri, have been exhausted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.