Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.3d 328 - Neal v. Janssen

Neal v. Janssen’s Empirical Analysis

270 F.3d 328 · 2001

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Milliken v. Meyer · Calder v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “making phone calls and sending facsimiles into the forum”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where an out-of-state agent is actively and personally involved in the conduct giving rise to the claim, the exercise of personal jurisdiction should depend on traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice; i.e., whether [the agent] purposely availed [himself] of the forum and the reasonably foreseeable consequences of that availment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purposefully directs communications into the forum, and those communications form the `heart' of the cause of action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.