Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.3d 416 - Travis Rippy, by Next Friend, Aaron and Janet Rippy

Travis Rippy, by Next Friend, Aaron and Janet Rippy’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 454 F. Supp. 2d 684 - Key v. DSW, INC. (2006), O'DONNELL v. Brown (2004)

2 district · 2 state decisions

450200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Anderson v. Creighton · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Tennessee law entrusts the decision whether to return a neglected child to the home from which he was removed to the Juvenile Court. The Department [of Children’s Services] acts in an advisory role to the Juvenile Court in recommending that the child is ready to return home. In performing that role, social workers in the Department act in much the same fashion as probation officers who make sentencing recommendations to criminal courts for which they are entitled to absolute immunity.... Social workers involved in the investigation or recommendation are, therefore, entitled to absolute immunity with respect to claims arising from such recommendations and investigations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right the official is alleged to have violated must have been 'clearly established1 in a more particularized, and hence more relevant, sense: The contours of the right must have been sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates the right. This is not to say that an official action is protected by qualified immunity unless the very action in question has previously been held unlawful; but it is to say that in the light of preexisting law the unlawfulness must be apparent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.