In Re James Kujawa’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably In Re: Stephen J. Jamo, Quigley v. Winter (2010)
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. · Blue v. United States Department of the Army · Vest v. Ziaee · Walton v. LaBarge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he cornerstone of imposing a monetary sanction . . . should be the selection of an amount no greater than sufficient to deter future misconduct by the party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not supported by the facts as being necessary to deter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not related concretely to redressing the harm”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.