Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 F.3d 94 - Arnold Roderrick v. Denny's Inc

Arnold Roderrick v. Denny's Inc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

15 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Norton v. Sam's Club · Graham v. Long Island Rail Road · Dennis James v. New York Racing Association New York State Racing & Wagering Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Asian American and African American] Plaintiffs have done little more than cite to their mistreatment and ask the court to conclude that it must have been related to their race. This is not sufficient.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the cited instances of hostility, considered in context, did little to support an inference of discriminatory intent. A failure to greet customers on an extremely busy evening and an exasperated — even testy — response to a complaint of discrimination do not constitute marked hostility as defined, nor are they conduct which should be presumed to have its origins in racial bias. Having been directed to remove Lizardo, the subsequent shoving of Lizardo and Du-gan by the security officers in the heated exchange of words does suggest anger, but there is nothing to suggest that the anger stemmed from a bias against people of Lizardo’s race.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Court must examine the entire record to determine if the [plaintiff] meets [his] ultimate burden of persuading the fact-finder of a central element of a ... claim; namely, that defendants intentionally discriminated against [him] on the basis of [his] race ... Whether summary judgment is appropriate here depends upon ‘the strength of the plaintiffs prima facie case, the probative value of the proof that the defendants’ explanation is false, and any other evidence’ that supports the defendants’ case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.