Burdick v. Allgood’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Maryland ex rel. Levin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been almost universally held that entrapment is a defense and cannot be asserted as grounds for a collateral attack on a Federal sentence. Moore v. United States, 334 F.2d 25 (5th Cir. 1964); Ellison v. United States, 283 F.2d 489 (10th Cir. 1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 885 , 81 S.Ct. 1038 , 6 L.Ed.2d 196 ; United States v. Bailey, 331 F.2d 218 (7th Cir. 1964); Matysek v. United States, 339 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 381 U.S. 917 , 85 S.Ct. 1545 , 14 L.Ed.2d 437 ; Anderson v. United States, 338 F.2d 618 (9tCir. 1964); Way v. United States, 276 F.2d 912 (10th Cir. 1960); Turner v. United States, 262 F.2d 643 (8th Cir. 1959); Stanley v. United States, 239 F.2d 765 (9th Cir. 1956).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.