Stultz v. Hp Enterprise Services, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Baker v. Carr · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress in the District of Columbia requires a plaintiff to show that he or she was (1) in the 'zone of danger;' which was (2) created by the defendant's negligence; (3) making the plaintiff fear for his or her own safety; resulting in (4) emotional distress that was serious and verifiable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.