Cromartie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Pace v. State (1999), King v. State (2000)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard for excusing a prospective juror based upon the prospective juror's views on the death penalty draws no religious or secular distinction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pace v. State · King v. State“The proper standard for determining the disqualification of a prospective juror based upon his views on capital punishment `is whether the juror's views would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pace v. State“The death qualification of prospective jurors is not unconstitutional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pace v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.