Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 Ind. 689 - Parks v. State

Parks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
September 1987
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Henderson v. State · Vacendak v. State · Beard v. State · Johnson v. State · Woodard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have clearly held that when a motion for a speedy trial has been made under Ind.R.Cr.P. 4(B) and the trial court has acted on that motion by setting a trial date, the motion will be deemed to have served its purpose. The defendant must then file a second motion for immediate trial to invoke his right under the rule when the trial is continued due to his action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.