Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 Kan. 237 - State v. Berg

State v. Berg’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2025

2 district · 18 state decisions

80200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sherry · State v. Zimmerman & Schmidt · State v. Puckett · State v. Bockert · State v. Chapman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Probable cause at a preliminary examination signifies 19 evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Pursuant to K.S.A. 22-2902(3), a defendant shall be bound over if the evidence shows that a felony has been committed and there is probable cause to believe that the felony has been committed by the defendant. [Citation omitted.] The evidence need not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, only probable cause. [Citation omitted.] Probable cause at a preliminary examination signifies evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused’s guilt. [Citation omitted.] The trial court must draw inferences favorable to the prosecution from the evidence presented at the prehminary examination. [Citation omitted.] The magistrate should not be concerned with the fact that the possibility of conviction is remote or virtually nonexistent. [Citation omitted.] Where the evidence tends to disclose that the offense charged was committed and the defendant committed it, the question is one for the jury to decide, even though the evidence is weak. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Berg, 270 Kan. 237, 238 , 13 P.3d 914 (2000).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Probable cause at a preliminary examination signifies evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.