Reifschneider v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Director of Taxation v. Kansas Krude Oil Reclaiming Co. · Murphy v. Nelson · In Re the Appeal of United Teleservices, Inc. · Tew v. City of Topeka Police & Fire Civil Service Commission · Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc. v. State Corp. Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The interpretation of a statute by an administrative agency charged with the responsibility of enforcing a statute is entitled to judicial deference and is called the doctrine of operative construction. Deference to an agency’s interpretation is particularly appropriate when the agency is one of special competence and ex perience.” Reifschneider v. Kansas State Lottery, 270 Kan. 560 , Syl. ¶ 2, 17 P.3d 907 (2001).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.